Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Essay

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc - attempt ExampleIn the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission vs. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc the court unflinching to lay precedent on the issue. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc are a clothing company in the unify States (Bittker, Idleman & Ravitch, 138). The company requires its employees to follow a realize policy, which does not allow them to wear black caps and clothes. The clothes reflected the flair of the business and the employees were to wear this to advertise the company. Sullivan talks about how its hard to exercise religious freedom in the country. Abercrombie does not define the meaning of the cap in their business constitution.Samantha Elauf, a Muslim, in 2008 applies for a speculate in Abercrombie. She wears a headscarf daily and even during her interview, she was wearing the hijab as part of the Muslim religion. Samantha Elauf does not pop out an opportunity to join the com pany because of the look policy of the enterprise. The company has lowered her rating on the prick of appearance because of the headscarf. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sues the company for violation of Title VII of the obliging Rights Act of 1964 for denying her chance of employment due to the headscarf. The company argues that she was to inform the individual interviewing her that she needed accommodation from the look policy of the enterprise. The company insisted that she should have told the interviewer that the headscarf expressed her religion.