The Amateur Scientist :: essays research papers

I was on my way to school, when I started to read this provoke story and I dont deny that I was a little sceptical in the beginning. But the more I read, the more I wanted to bed somewhat this man and his unique ways to define Science. I finished reading it in ab come in 15 minutes, it literally sucked me in.This is an attempt to analyze and pardon to the "audience," what my personal point of view is regarding this great genius, great mind, great scientist Richard Feynman. Defined by his colleagues as the "The brightest mind since Einstein," he explains how he used everyday tools to cod scientific discoveries. How he describes his methods in a simple way makes science enjoyable and understandable, even to the average reader.I enjoyed reading the essay entitled "The unpaid Scientist," by Nobel prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman (1918-1988). I found it to be very interesting and felt that Mr. Feynman was very thoughtful. Rather than explain in techn ical detail about his work in physics, Feynman instead related interesting anecdotes throughout his life, as a college student and graduate student at Princeton University, that gave to the reader an understanding of his work as a scientist. The writing won my attention because his stories about his youth and his days at Princeton fascinated me. He was always exploring his environment to learn new things about science, especially how things worked. Feynmans thirst for clever things to do and clever ways to do ordinary things were remarkable. One of the best anecdotes that illustrate this point, was his experience at Princeton detailing ants behavior. Feynman was invariably searching for the connection between hypothesis and truth, so one day at Princeton he started to observe the ants that were coming out on his windowsill. The experiment with the ants is a reflection of this mans mind, always in search for an answer. In this anecdote Feynman explains how, with only a bit of sugar, and a couple of pieces of paper, he was able to find out many things about ants behaviors. Feynman compares his study on the ants with the same kind of "experiment" he performed in Brazil, observing leaf-cutting ants. The author pointed out that, although the Brazilian ants seemed to be smarter, thither are still some affinities with domestic ants. It is remarkable how Feynman discovered that ants agree no sense of "geometry," the goal of his experiment was to determine whether or not ants have some kind of communication and if they have the ability to find their way back where the "food" was.