Keeping the Drinking Age at 21

Listening to the word of honor on television, hearing other students talk active it, is it really true, or are they going to lower the bever epoch age to 18? This is non equitable a rumor but nowhere give they very lowered the age. The debate has been talked approximately for the last few years. The nation has invariably tried different things to solve the irresponsible topeing problems. In roam to try and prevent this problem America has tried a subject area prohibition in the 1920s and state prohibitions in the 1850s. Many turn over that rising the inebriation age has saved conveys of numerous young adults. in that location has been evidence that the take ining age of 21 has decreased the kernel of tragic car accidents link to alcoholic drink between young adults. Since 1987 the decrease of bedeviling and private road problems have gone down. If they did lower the drinking age to 18 or 19 the to a greater extent than health link problems the young adults w ould wield with once they get one-time(a). On the other hand the current law of nature of the minimum drinking age at 21 leads to problems behind the scenes. The amount of students at colleges under the age 21 are more in all probability to be binge drinkers, which means they have more than cardinal drinks in a row.This flock be very dangerous to the body. Many in any case argue that if a soulfulness is old enough to fight for the field they should be old enough to have a beer. Also if a bulk are expected to be able responsible and live on their own at eighteen they should be able to be responsible enough to drink on their own. There are many another(prenominal) another(prenominal) pros and cons to lowering the drinking age, but the near important reason not to lower the drinking age is to protect the lives of young adults. A conform to found that out of 1,881 surveyed college students 88 pct of males and 86 percent of females give tongue to they were drinkers (Gonzal ez 2).Many adults have observe the problem of underage drinking and require to fix the problem. If the states were to lower the drinking age we would be go downting many lives at danger. Many studies have shown that the minimum drinking age of 21 has saved many lives when it turns to drinking and driving. In the article College-age Drinking Problems states the age encumber at 21 has saved 16,500 lives in vocation crashes just since 1975 (Hingson 1). Traffic crashes are one of the leading causes of deaths in America for battalion under the age 25. 10,431 people between ages 15 and 24 died in 1996 from fatal traffic crashes and 45% of them were link up to alcohol (1). By passing the drinking age to 21 it will continue to save many lives from traffic crashes. The amount of alcohol related accidents doubles if a soulfulness has a . 02 percent increase in melodic phrase alcohol level. For people under 21 drinking and driving increases the risk of being conglomerate in a feta l traffic crash with distributively cloudburst drink they have. As Hingson says For young drivers, drinking is like throwing gasoline on a fire (1).It is illegal for anyone under 21 to drive with blood alcohol level more than . 0 percent. With this law alcohol related traffic deaths has dropped 57 percent from 5380 in 1982 to 2315 in 1996 with people ages 15 to 20 (2). Lowering the legal limit for the amount allowed of blood alcohol content (BAC) for drivers will continue to save lives. The lowering of BAC has shown a 5 to 8 percent decrease in alcohol related traffic crashes (Wagenaar 6). Drivers under 21 who are intoxicated are more belike to get involved in traffic crashes, because they have less experience on the road.Communities have noticed the problem with underage drinking and driving and started The Saving Lives Project, which was designed to reduce alcohol impaired driving and related problems (Holder 2). This project uses media and command to get the word out about t he risk of drinking. The communities that are apart of this project have shown a 40 percent reduction in alcohol related fatal crashes (Holder 2). The project has been shown that older teens ages sixteen to nineteen are now less likely to drink and drive after learning about the risks in alcohol related classes.Colleges that have nail down a week to focus on education and prevention of alcohol have shown a five-fold increase (Gonzalez 4). Not tho does alcohol affect a person once they drink a beverage but it withal affects them in their future. If people start drinking at a younger age the more problems they will ascertain in their future. Over the animateness of many people it has been proven that most people drink the most in their late teens and early mid-twenties (Chen 1). Drinking in young adults is turning to be a honorable concern with public health. By exceeding the daily drinking limit is about four or more drinks in a champion day, and college teens shown that hey binge drink. Binge drinking is when a person consumes more than five drinks in one setting (Hingson 1). People who binge drinks are more likely to do things they regret, fall back in schoolwork and befit hurt or injured. Alcohol can cause risky behaviors and spry and long-term problems with health. Becoming stricter on under age drinking laws can prevent this. If the cops gave more MIPs out to parties with underage drinking teens would be less likely to drink. Even though many would consort to conserve the drinking age at 21, many would also have many reasons why to lower the drinking age to 18.One main railway line is if a person is old enough to fight for the country, vote or live on their own they should be old enough to drink (Johnson 1). If a man and women is old enough to go to war and put their life at risk they should be able to drink on their own. People would argue if they are old enough to vote for the person who runs the country, then whats the difference in choosin g the responsibility of drinking. Colleges have also debated the fact of lowering the drinking age. College president McCardell says it does not reduce drinking. It simply puts young adults at smashinger risks. (2) Many agree with McCardell and say that the drinking age of 21 does not prevent college students from drinking. It just causes them to drink under background. If young adults do drink under ground they are more likely to binge drink and put their life at risk. 85 percent of 20 year old Americans report that they have used alcohol, and two out of five said they have binge drank (2). Johnson believes that if they lowering the drinking age young adults would learn to drink responsibly and plosive speech sound binge drinking. Even though they are great arguments, raising the drink to 21 has proof with statistics that it has saved lives of many each year.It is more important to save the lives of people than it is to let them drink. Educating young adults about the risks of d rinking can also prevent binge drinking. If the community worked unitedly to have alcohol awareness days more people would be aware of the problem of underage drinking. The more people know about the problem the more people will work together to stop the problem. It can also stop underage drinking by creating more laws towards the people who sell to minors. If more people got in trouble for marketing to minors the less people would sell to minors.The communities who have taken the shade up in stopping underage drinking problems have noticed a huge change in the amount of deaths related to alcohol. By keeping the age at 21, it will continually save lives of accidents related to alcohol. If there was not a problem with the drinking age at 21 they would have never raised the age to 21, the law was set in place for a reason and it has been shown that it is a good law. As a parent many are worried about their children and pauperization to make sure they will not ruin their life with alcohol related problems.